[General] King of Lively part II : LIE and CHEAT

Steve Wart steve.wart at gmail.com
Wed Nov 11 06:44:15 CET 2009

IMO Javascript was a much better strategic choice than Java.

The people who need to be aware of Lively are the same people who made
jQuery succeed.

I love the way Google has documented their Javascript APIs. I think
this approach would help. Very few people will want to build entire
"sites" on Lively but parts of it should be widely adopted.

Did someone mention a debugger?

Keep up the good work :-)


On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Peter Fraser <pfraser at spatialmedia.com> wrote:
> Short version:
> IMO, the *Java* version of Lively is the fast route to a universal,
> fast, tight platform. Such a platform ?is a prerequisite for an active
> community.

More information about the lively-kernel mailing list